>>1397cute lesbian
>>1399It's been ages, but isn't she super into Shaoran?
>>1404Me after >>1407 tries to grab my phone.
The cat that this cat girl is inspired by being male weirds me out.
>>1458How do you know it's a catgirl and not a catboy trap?
>>1459She labeled as 女の子.
>>1488I can't read these runes. All I can parse is something about internet and (school?) girls.
>>1492its koishi
>>1488>>1492>「性的動画で8万円の収入」>藤野容疑者>女子高校生にわいせつ行為>動画をインターネット配信し収入を得ようとするも女子生徒に動画配信を断れるMaking online lewd videos while dressed as Koishi.
>>1488>>1492
>「性的動画で8万円の収入」>藤野容疑者>女子高校生にわいせつ行為>動画をインターネット配信し収入を得ようとするも女子生徒に動画配信を断れる
Making online lewd videos while dressed as Koishi.
>>1497Why is she naked on the bed?
>>1502SEX
>>1503But anon, that's a child!
eat the froot budy
Very wholesome image.
poor laundry's in deep shit again
There's a tiny anime girl on your motherboard. Heat keeps her alive
Gaming is really cool.
>>1577
>>1567
>>1627I am selfless, so I always offer vampire girls my D.
>>1629want to put my runick tip into hugin
>>1630Hugin is a raven, not a fairy, silly.
>>1631not in my anime stupid
>>1632Anon, in Yu-Gi-Oh! 'fairy' is just an (intentional) mistranslation of 天使, meaning 'angel'. Even there she's only a fairy in the translation!
>>1633she's clearly a funsized fairy in all the art she's in dude
>captcha: towffness
>>1352
captcha: jebing
>>1708tempted to buy the domain and redirect it here tbh
gelbooru is back
>>1735Not a single mention of the situation on /jp/. /jp/ really has declined...
>captcha: stespation
>>1776satanic image
>>1794Totally forgot those two were from the same seriesOomuroke is so much better holy shit
>>1795If it's so much better, why doesn't it have an anime adaptation?
>>1796Realistically if it goes on long enough it will, but the format with multiple independent protagonists isn't suitable for the shitpile that is TV so it'll probably just be hanako-sama as the protagonist with the others as offshoots of the main show.Getting or continuing an anime is hardly a mark of quality though.
>>1797>but the format with multiple independent protagonists isn't suitable for the shitpile that is TVHaven't read Oomura-ke, but this worked fine for Nichijou, didn't it?
>>1797
>but the format with multiple independent protagonists isn't suitable for the shitpile that is TV
Haven't read Oomura-ke, but this worked fine for Nichijou, didn't it?
>>1798Nichijou was neither a good manga nor a good anime
>captcha: fisting
>>1835lewd captcha degen
>>1835lewd
captcha degen
>>1866
>>1884>Have sex, incel.>P-please have sex.>PLEASE JUST HAVE SEX OR YOU'LL DESTROY OUR GREAT COUNTRY AAAAAAhaha, no
>>1884
>Have sex, incel.>P-please have sex.>PLEASE JUST HAVE SEX OR YOU'LL DESTROY OUR GREAT COUNTRY AAAAAA
haha, no
>>1885What they're saying is that spying on you is warranted because you're not having sex and therefore you're a threat to national security.
>>1884My initial expectation was that it'd be an excuse to charge children under existing terrorist but it doesn't seem like it's really anything at all. He also didn't go on about incels either, he raised it as an example of "issue motivated" individual actors a la the supreme gentlemen and the journos are just being fags about it because that happened to be the example he gave; the bulk of the speech it's from is about how his focus has shifted from terrorism to counterespionage.So far as I can tell, for ASIO to classify a group as a terrorist organization they currently can call them a ideologically motivated group or a religiously motivated group, and he just wants a less retarded or more exploitable classification system.>"Threats to security are well-defined, it's not unlawful for people to have a Neo-Nazi ideology in this country.">>1888There's no rhyme or reason to australian media law, nor does it have any bearing on the surveillance of the population which precedes the existence of this kind of law altogether. Besides funding puddles of corruption, I think most of that kind of thing that gets passed into law does so for the sake of currying votes from offended hags on facebook.
>>1884My initial expectation was that it'd be an excuse to charge children under existing terrorist but it doesn't seem like it's really anything at all. He also didn't go on about incels either, he raised it as an example of "issue motivated" individual actors a la the supreme gentlemen and the journos are just being fags about it because that happened to be the example he gave; the bulk of the speech it's from is about how his focus has shifted from terrorism to counterespionage.So far as I can tell, for ASIO to classify a group as a terrorist organization they currently can call them a ideologically motivated group or a religiously motivated group, and he just wants a less retarded or more exploitable classification system.
>"Threats to security are well-defined, it's not unlawful for people to have a Neo-Nazi ideology in this country."
>>1888There's no rhyme or reason to australian media law, nor does it have any bearing on the surveillance of the population which precedes the existence of this kind of law altogether. Besides funding puddles of corruption, I think most of that kind of thing that gets passed into law does so for the sake of currying votes from offended hags on facebook.
>>1889I see. I guess I got taken in by shitty reporting here, probably because intelligence services in my country are actually refocusing from preventing terrorism to preventing wrongthink they deem a threat to democracy. Still,>to classify a group as a terrorist organization they currently can call them a ideologically motivated group or a religiously motivated groupIsn't that exactly what terrorism is? The whole point of terrorism is to intimidate (terrorize) people into accepting certain ideological notions or demands. If there's no ideological motivation (including religion-based ideology) or it's an individual deciding by themselves to commit violent crime, it's not terrorism. The distinction is important because once we let lone wolves be classified as 'terrorists' that gives government agencies the excuse to use anti-terrorism legislation against wrongthinking individuals, rather than against actual groups formed to commit terrorism which the laws were made for.
>>1889I see. I guess I got taken in by shitty reporting here, probably because intelligence services in my country are actually refocusing from preventing terrorism to preventing wrongthink they deem a threat to democracy. Still,
>to classify a group as a terrorist organization they currently can call them a ideologically motivated group or a religiously motivated group
Isn't that exactly what terrorism is? The whole point of terrorism is to intimidate (terrorize) people into accepting certain ideological notions or demands. If there's no ideological motivation (including religion-based ideology) or it's an individual deciding by themselves to commit violent crime, it's not terrorism. The distinction is important because once we let lone wolves be classified as 'terrorists' that gives government agencies the excuse to use anti-terrorism legislation against wrongthinking individuals, rather than against actual groups formed to commit terrorism which the laws were made for.
>rather than against actual groups formed to commit terrorism which the laws were made for.Was this a joke?>>1891>Isn't that exactly what terrorism is?I haven't read the ASIO guidelines but just speculating from his quotes in an interview about why there are so few right wing extremist groups classed as terrorists (it was because they don't actually fedpost, apparently) it sounds like "ideologically motivated group" probably has a retarded definition and can't be stretched to cover groups not affiliated with political platforms.>The distinction is important because once we let lone wolves be classified as 'terrorists'To be clear, he mentioned incels as a type hate group that doesn't fall under the current guidelines (and they do post actionable threats of violence) and mentioned that ASIO's current threat model expects most violent acts of terror to come from individuals who are emboldened/radicalized by extremist rhetoric but not being coordinated by an extremist group as two separate statements. The example of elliot rodger was my own speculation. Keep in mind that tarrant is the last real criminal news case in australia and next most recent examples of a lone actor was the big false flag in 1996 that led to the gun grabbing and then some national heroes from the colonial days.>that gives government agencies the excuse to use anti-terrorism legislation against wrongthinking individualsI think I'm feeling culture shock reading this. Australia's government has always prosecuted wrongthinking individuals however they feel like, and the legislation for doing so is mostly much more robust than the actual anti-terror bills: most states including NSW (which is ~60% of the nation) have infinite detention without a charge and probably the worst media laws in the world (if rarely enforced), and an entire state is basically under martial law (because of abbos). There is a literal firewall, and it's there for moral reasons not as an anti-terror measure. The only real consequence of anti-terror stuff I can think of is the warrantless gag order on software developers from 2020 or so.Of course, everything being illegal is an academic fact with no actual influence on australian behavior.
>rather than against actual groups formed to commit terrorism which the laws were made for.
Was this a joke?>>1891
>Isn't that exactly what terrorism is?
I haven't read the ASIO guidelines but just speculating from his quotes in an interview about why there are so few right wing extremist groups classed as terrorists (it was because they don't actually fedpost, apparently) it sounds like "ideologically motivated group" probably has a retarded definition and can't be stretched to cover groups not affiliated with political platforms.
>The distinction is important because once we let lone wolves be classified as 'terrorists'
To be clear, he mentioned incels as a type hate group that doesn't fall under the current guidelines (and they do post actionable threats of violence) and mentioned that ASIO's current threat model expects most violent acts of terror to come from individuals who are emboldened/radicalized by extremist rhetoric but not being coordinated by an extremist group as two separate statements. The example of elliot rodger was my own speculation. Keep in mind that tarrant is the last real criminal news case in australia and next most recent examples of a lone actor was the big false flag in 1996 that led to the gun grabbing and then some national heroes from the colonial days.
>that gives government agencies the excuse to use anti-terrorism legislation against wrongthinking individuals
I think I'm feeling culture shock reading this. Australia's government has always prosecuted wrongthinking individuals however they feel like, and the legislation for doing so is mostly much more robust than the actual anti-terror bills: most states including NSW (which is ~60% of the nation) have infinite detention without a charge and probably the worst media laws in the world (if rarely enforced), and an entire state is basically under martial law (because of abbos). There is a literal firewall, and it's there for moral reasons not as an anti-terror measure. The only real consequence of anti-terror stuff I can think of is the warrantless gag order on software developers from 2020 or so.Of course, everything being illegal is an academic fact with no actual influence on australian behavior.
I can't figure out what it's a reference to
>>1899it's either inmu or another reference i don't know
>>1914I hate LGBT now.
Didn't masturbate for like 3-4 days and had a dream about getting fucked by futa centaurs
>>1933bankai
>>1934https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzhnlgGE3cw
>captcha: shamement
>>1985me when i try to shit
>>1991But cumming in them when they're a little girl is the best time to do so, you don't have to risk pregnancy.
>>1992Anon, you should always respect a little girl's wishes when having sex with her.
>>2000checked
rump
>>2074This is a fake screenshot made to slander mammoth. He is a little girl appreciator.
>>2075You don't find debt erotic?
>>2076Debt is only erotic if girls under the age of 18 are used to pay it off.
me in the middle>>2074hags exist to serve little girls
Truly scary costumes.
the rain prank chapter was a fucking masterpiece
>captcha wowthing
Two best girls.
>>2188nice dubsThumbnails remind me of 君としらない夏になる>worst corea strikes again
>>2188nice dubsThumbnails remind me of 君としらない夏になる
>worst corea strikes again
ribbon warrior cast finally getting some attention cos they showed up in the mobile game www
>pillwewew
>pill
wewew
>>2254VNs then/VNs nowWhat happened?
>>2255flanderization
>>2262they don't look like her though
learnt unity asset exctraction so I can get better screenshots of loliprons
heavy water
fuck the moon
>>2279
nue sexo
what a shame
>coycute
>coy
cute
Can a primary/secondary help me out:Did they really blow one of their best designs, and the best bandage girl designs we've had in a while on a non-player character, or is this business as usual and chars get teased nonplayable before they get sent to the gacha pigs?
>>2353She will be "playable" at some point but it will take at least a year
>>2366
>>2385
>>2416
>>2417english version
>>2418I really did. Tired of the Internet, guess I should finally fuck off. It's pointless though, I will come back sooner or later anyway.
take it easily
>>2420I wish I could.
captcha drowzzness
whale spotting
>>2478
>>2481
My jims are about to cum out.
>>2486
>captcha doxing
>captcha pepeish
found a cute wallpaper for the phone im taking to japan
>>2622plot twist: this is the first panel in an instant loss comic
こいし
>>2629me working on the movie
>>2643
laugh all you want this is what peak performance looks like
>>2723Shouldn't it be a slowpoke tail?
>>2725
It's been a while since the last vn I read.
- wakaba 3.0.9 + teen spirit + all my friends -